While the media fawns all over Christine Blasey-Ford and her phony testimony, one thing that stood out that’s not getting any attention is what she said regarding her hiring of the Katz lawfirm to represent her. Who suggested Christine Blasey-Ford hire an attorney in the first place? It was none other than Chinese spy harboring Diane Feinstein! And that was in August, weeks before she leaked Blasey-Ford’s information to the Washington Post. And of course Feinstein recommend that Blasey-Ford hire none other than the so called “resister” Debra Katz. BTW, Blasey-Ford claimed (under oath) that Katz and Bromwich are working “pro-bono.” Does anyone really believe that?
| Diane Feinstein told Blasey-Ford to find an attorney in August (while hiding rape claims) |
|---|
|
If Blasey-Ford really wanted to remain anonymous and if Feinstein didn’t intend to leak her claims to the Washington Post, why would Blasey-Ford need an attorney? If her goal was to stay out of the shadows, there would have been no need for an attorney, at least until her name was leaked to the corrupt media.
If you are stupid enough to believe that the Democrats and George Soros aren’t funding Debra Katz and Micheal Bromwich, then you’d make a perfect progressive communist.