Apparently now, you can’t even defend yourself. Own a rifle, get it taken away without even firing a shot. That’s what happened to the McCloskey Family of St. Louis after black lives matter terrorists broke through a gate to “protest” their property. In the now viral photo of both Ken and Patricia McCloskey defending their homes with firearms, the left has been triggered and the so called “authorities” have seized their rifles. The McCloskey family was forced to hire private security to protect them nights later when the terrorist communists returned.
Over 50 people online have offered the McCLoskey family free rifles to replace the ones stole by authorities. So far though, the McCloskey family hasn’t taken anyone up on their offers for free rifles.
The most revealing part of this whole McCloskey debacle isn’t so much on the communist Democrat side. It’s the gutless, spineless Republicans who their there, with their fingers up their asses and don’t do a damn thing about the abuse.
| McCloskey family offered free rifles from 50 people online after St. Louis takes their’s for defending their home |
|---|
|
It’s really too bad the McCloskeys aren’t taking anyone up on their offer. Can you imagine the reaction if the couple actually accepted those donated firearms, then turned around and donated them as well; this time to St. Louis mothers and fathers in un-gated neighborhoods who would love an AR-15 to protect their families? Sharing the wealth, so to speak.
I’m sure there are plenty of good people in not-so-great neighborhoods who would love to have a free gun that they could use in case they become the victim of a home invasion or robbery. It would be also pretty un-elitist for the millionaire couple to work to ensure that every law-abiding St. Louisian has the same opportunity to exercise their Second Amendment rights, regardless of income.
It won’t happen, of course, though it would be fun to see. What’s far more likely to happen, at least according to the McCloskeys’ attorney, is that the couple will actually face a charge. Joel Schwartz says he believes that “charges are more likely” than they were several days ago, and indicated that a brandishing charge might be the most likely possibility if St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner does proceed with charges.
Gardner’s finding herself in a little controversy of her own at the moment, given her office’s delay in filing charges against Terrence Page, who openly admits to attacking a man at the statue of Louis IX in downtown St. Louis back on June 27th. If her office ends up filing charges against the McCloskeys for brandishing a firearm before it brings charges against Page, it’s only going to open up Gardner to more accusations of political motivation in her prosecution of the couple, and not without reason.