Since the lousy, good for nothing media wouldn’t investigate politicians ties to the China Communist Party and how the communists have made politicians rich, I guess we are going to have to. First up is none other than California witch and Democrat Senator Diane Feinstein, now one of thee richest members of the Senate. When Feinstein, a former San Francisco mayor was first elected to the Senate in 1992, she and her corrupt husband Richard Blum’s interests in China amounted to less than $500,000. By 1995, that total in China doubled. Now, the Feinstein Crime Family (Who once employed a Chinese spy) has their Thanksgiving dinner with the former president of China, at least they did in 2015. Back before Winnie The Flu Xi became President and dictator of China, Feinstein had then Jiang Zemin at the Feinstein estate in California back in 2015. Zemin was dictator of China from 1993-2003.
Corrupt Diane Feinstein and her husband have gotten rich after selling out the China Communist Party |
---|
When Feinstein was first elected to the Senate in 1992, Blum’s interests in China amounted to less than $500,000. She was named to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1995 and by 1997, according to the Los Angeles Times, “Blum’s interest had grown to between $500,001 and $1 million.”
In 1994, Blum’s company, Blum Capital, had entered a joint venture to found Newbridge Capital, specializing in emerging markets, including Asia. Blum said in 1997 that less than 2% of the approximately $1.5 billion that his firm managed was committed to China. He held a $300 million stake in Northwest Airlines when it operated the only nonstop service from the United States to cities in China. In 2002, Newbridge was negotiating to acquire 20% of Shenzhen Development Bank. After some rough seas, it paid $145 million for an 18% share two years later, marking the first time a Chinese bank came under control of a foreign entity.
Yet the record shows that the marriage between Blum’s business and Feinstein’s political career is a very close one. Journalists from Feinstein’s home state’s two largest media markets, Los Angeles and San Francisco, covered that relationship thoroughly and often quite skeptically throughout the 1990s and early 2000s. The fact that relationships that should have come under serious scrutiny have rarely been portrayed in anything other than a favorable light—the New Yorker breathlessly reported in a 2015 profile that China’s former President Jiang Zemin had spent Thanksgiving as a guest at the Blum-Feinstein home in San Francisco—reveals the extent to which the American elite has subscribed wholesale to the unproven theory that business with the Chinese Communist Party was good for America.