Why is it that the left, including their propaganda clowns in the media are always defending terrorists? Iraqi terrorists backed by Iranians tried to attack the US Embassy in Baghdad today and the New York Times is calling them “mourners”. Seriously!
Let us remind these hacks at the New York Times that the terrorists who attacked our embassy in Baghdad were Iranian backed terrorists Kata’ib Hezbollah.
| New York Times calls Iraqi terrorists who attacked US Embassy (backed by Iran) ‘mourners’ |
|---|
|
Hundreds of Iraqi mourners tried to storm the United States Embassy in Baghdad, shouting “Down, down USA!,” in response to deadly American airstrikes this week that killed 25 fighters https://t.co/jrAtON72eR
— The New York Times (@nytimes) December 31, 2019
“Mourners.” It’s not hard to see which side the New York Times sympathizes with here https://t.co/kjcPW9XTd7
— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) December 31, 2019
Iraqi “mourners”?
It’s like @JZarif has become the Managing Editor of the New York Times.
These are Iranian backed terrorists attacking US military personnel & diplomats shouting “Death to America” as they try to break into the US Embassy in Baghdad setting fires on the way. https://t.co/plrUF4Giu0
— Lee Zeldin (@RepLeeZeldin) December 31, 2019
Nine hours later and the New York Times still hasn't corrected its description of Hezbollah terrorists in Baghdad as "Iraqi mourners." They're the new Austere Scholars, folks. https://t.co/L2hNl5tdqd
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) December 31, 2019
The New York Times calls them “Iraqi mourners,” but make no mistake: this was an attack from Iranian-backed Kata’ib Hezbollah, a terrorist organization.
We are praying for those at the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. https://t.co/5sdHluLjlM
— Bill Hagerty (@BillHagertyTN) December 31, 2019
How much Iranian-lobbied must the New York Times be to call attacking members of a US-designated terror organization “mourners”?! …
A disgrace for journalism.— Julian Röpcke (@JulianRoepcke) December 31, 2019