Now Robin Pogrebin and the New York Times are trying to victim shame the so called Brett Kavanaugh “victim” in the latest smear of him. Robin Pogrebin who gave a radio interview to WMAL is now trying to imply that the “victim” was just too drunk to remember what happened to her. The nerve of these hacks! SUE THEM! Let’s also try to remember that Robin Pogrebin isn’t even a political or law reporter for the New York Times. SHe’s a fricken “Culture Reporter”! If Brett Kavanaugh doesn’t sue the New York Times, Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, maybe the so called “victiM” well sue. They revealed her name in the upcoming propaganda book when she didn’t want to be revealed. She would have plenty of grounds to sue on.
“And so I think we’re talking about memory here. It’s, you know, a really kind of a questionable issue,” Pogrebin said Tuesday to WMAL. “There are plenty of things that, you know, that are conceivable that could happen when people are too drunk to remember them I .”
| Robin Pogrebin implies that Kavanaugh “victim” was too drunk to remember latest smear |
|---|
|
If you want to skip the other lies and propaganda, you can start listening to the interview at about the 15 minute mark. That’s where Robin Pogrebin makes her asinine assumption.
NEW: NYT author @rpogrebin calls Max Stier — who's responsible for this latest, wild Kavanaugh allegation — a "eye witness who is highly credible."
Stier worked on Bill Clinton's impeachment defense team.https://t.co/j7VMbHqT7c
— Vince Coglianese (@VinceCoglianese) September 17, 2019
The arrogance of these leftist media hacks is absolutely incredible.