Usually, the New York Times and other liberal propaganda rags blame white males for being racists. Now, it’s white women too. If they don’t move off to the side and let a black man pass, white women are racist now, according to the New York Times.
| NY Times white women racist if they don’t move when a black man is in their path |
|---|
|
After these encounters, I’m always left with questions. Why only and specifically white women? Do they refuse to acknowledge me because they’ve been taught that they should fear black men, and that any acknowledgment of black men can invite danger? Do they refuse to acknowledge me because to alter their route would be to show their fear? Do they not see me? Can they not see me?
I wonder, too, why I always get out of the way. Why haven’t I ever just walked headlong into a rude white woman? What lessons tug at me, force me off the sidewalk, tell me that my personal space is not necessarily mine? Because explicit in every white woman’s decision not to get out of my way is the expectation that I’ll get out of theirs.
There have always been white women in my life, and I’ve counted them as friends and sisters, mothers and lovers. Whenever I ask white women I know why they don’t reroute for black men, they invariably express ignorance. Whenever that happens, another question always arises: Wait, am I crazy? But then I ask black men. Invariably, they know what I’m talking about.
A couple of weeks ago, I asked an Asian friend if he had the same experience of white women not getting out of his way. He said no. For whatever reason, white women see him just fine. The people who don’t, he said, are white men.
Get out of the way honky women, black man coming through. If you don’t get out of the way, you are racist according to liberals and the New York Times. I don’t think all blacks agree with this asinine conclusion by the New York Times.
The only thing missing from this ridiculous article is that the Russians made the white women not move or something.