What if Dylann Roof had target police officers like Bill Ayers instead of innocent people attending a Wednesday bible study at church? He’d be a domestic terrorist and probably have a job already lined up in the university systems like Bill Ayers. So why are people so hesitant to call Roof a terrorist? Bill Ayers is a domestic terrorist and hero of the left for attacking cops, or it least his ‘Weather Underground did.’ The whole mentally unstable excuse is old and tired. Obviously Dylann Roof had to be mentally unstable to commit an act like he did. But can’t you say that about all terrorists? Bill Ayers is any more mentally stable? A Muslim terrorist with Al-Qaeda, the Taliban or ISIS isn’t mentally unstable? Anyone who can kill someone else simply out of hate, and not while protecting themselves is mentally unstable as far as I’m concerned.
| If Dylann Roof had targeted cops… |
|---|
|
If the American hating Dylann Roof who burned American flags, hated Jews and blacks, why isn’t him targeting a black church in Charleston terrorist? Roof attacked the black church because the people there were black. What’s the difference between that and a Muslim terrorist attack an ‘infidel’ Christians or Jews because they aren’t Muslim?
Are we so politically correct in this country that we can’t call a white racist a terrorist when he commits an action of terrorism?
Dylann Roof is a skinny, wimpy, piece of shit with a 1970’s bowl-cut who is as much of a terrorist as Bill Ayers. Targeting cops, or targeting black people doesn’t make you any less of a terrorist. Of course is Dylann Roof had targeted cops, he’d be hailed as a hero of the left. But since liberal progressives keep blacks on the plantation, they can’t come out and openly defend someone like Roof.