Dallas Country Judge Clay Jenkins was virtually unknown until he went into going into the apartment where Ebola patient, Thomas Eric Duncan, lived while he was sick. Now, a complaint against Clay Jenkins has been filed with Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. Jenkins did not wear a hazmat suit, or any other protection when entering Duncan’s apartment. The judge was in the apartment with four other people, exposed to Ebola and are currently quarantined. The anonymous person who filed the complaint tells Breitbart that he feels Clay Jenkins’ conduct was inappropriate and unnecessarily exposed his child to potential danger. Oh BTW, Clay Jenkins as a Democrat, and a big amnesty pimping one too.
|
Oh, BTW Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins also gave $40,000 to Democrats.
Dallas Judge Clay Jenkins has given 40k to Democrats and is allowing illegals to be housed in Grand Prairie! pic.twitter.com/ADtpguD6ZS
— Mona (@monalesaa) July 8, 2014
Breitbart Texas has learned a complaint was filed with Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, also known as CPS. The complaint was filed on Sunday morning by a concerned Dallas citizen who read about Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins going into the apartment where Ebola patient, Thomas Eric Duncan, lived while he was sick. He was in the apartment with four people who had been directly exposed by Duncan to the Ebola virus. Jenkins said, in a subsequent press conference he was going home to his wife and nine-year-old daughter after a subsequent press conference where he discussed being in the apartment again and driving the exposed family to their new home — a forty-five minute drive. At no point did Jenkins appear to wear any protective clothing.
The concerned citizen reached out to Breitbart Texas in a phone interview and provided information about his complaint to CPS. He told Brietbart Texas he wanted to remain anonymous because he is a business owner and is concerned about retaliation. He said he felt Jenkins’ conduct was inappropriate and unnecessarily exposed his child to potential danger. “I am doing this because I am concerned about the child,” the complainant said, “and I am concerned for the children in her school who might become exposed if the virus were to spread.”