Personally, I’m enjoying seeing the corrupt propaganda media turn on Chris Christie. I can’t stand the man. But watching the New York Times ‘quietly‘ change their ‘bombshell’ story from Port Authority David Wildstein having evidence of Chris Christie’s knowledge of the George Washington Bridge to now ‘evidence exists’ once again demonstrates how corrupt they are. Twitchy grabbed a screenshot of the New York Times original ‘tweet’ claiming Wildstein ‘has evidence’ that Christie knew about the bridge closure.
|
| New York Times quietly alters Chris Christie Story: Port Authority Official No Longer ‘Has Evidence,’ |
|---|
The New York Times is basically the MSNBC of newspapers.
Longtime readers here may recall that yours truly and others have written about liberties New York Times reporter Kate Zernike has taken with the truth, especially in her reporting on the Tea Party movement. Her penchant for inventing baseless stories about alleged racism in the movement once caused the late Andrew Breitbart to label her “a despicable human being.”
Breitbart might well have the same reaction to the hours-later revision made at Zernike’s Times story Friday about Chris Christie. Several alert bloggers and tweeters noted that her story about Christie’s knowledge of shut lanes on the George Washington Bridge conveniently went from solid to speculative without any indication that any changes had been made.
No matter how much I had Chris Christie, I had the corrupt progressive liberal Democrat media complex even more. They need to be exposed for the activists that they truly are.