Wah! Wendy Davis is a victim because she’s a woman or something. That’s the latest excuse for Abortion Barbie’s lies about her past to advance her political career according to Kirsten Powers in the Daily Beast leftist rag. You see, despite Wendy Davis and her staff mocking their oppenentss for a disability, and lying to advance her political career, Wendy Davis is the victim in all of this because she’s a female. This is the same faux feminist Kirsten Powers who once dated Anthony Weiner, and defended the right of a teacher to view porn in the class room and by paid for. Powers not only attacks conservatives, but also Breitbart writers. Funny how Powers never had such passion for defending female conservatives who are routinely smeared when they tell the truth by her ilk. Kirsten Powers yet again proves exactly what progressive liberals ‘feminists’ are. They are nothing but hypocrites.
The right has been heaping scorn upon Davis because she and her husband decided that their children should stay in Texas with him while she studied in Boston. Ben Shapiro of Brietbart tweeted, “The real question: if you wear pink shoes, how fast can you run away from your parental responsibilities?” RedState blogger Erick Erickson tweeted, ”So Abortion Barbie had a Sugar Daddy Ken” and then, “Just think, if Wendy Davis gets elected, she could create “take your daughter to her dad” day. Ann Coulter complained, “I’m … stuck on her leaving her kids behind while she headed off to a law school 1,500 miles away.”
For crying out loud, she didn’t leave her children on the side of the road. She left them to live with their father. It’s fair to criticize Davis for her misleading bio that implied she had been a single mother during law school. Instead, a misogynistic mob is determined to punish her for her parenting choices.
It’s sad that the attacks on Davis are coming uniformly from people who call themselves “pro-life.” Many women in Davis’s position–pregnant and unmarried at 18 years old–would have gotten an abortion. She didn’t. But that’s not enough to satisfy the right. Once she had the baby–and another with her second husband–she was expected to follow the right’s designated script or suffer dearly for it.